Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812056›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2023

Craniofacial developmental biology in the single-cell era.

Kuo-Chang Tseng, J Gage Crump

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence-based classification of genes implicated in craniosynostosis disorders using the ClinGen curation framework.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the role ofFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The primary cilia: Orchestrating cranial neural crest cell development.Differentiation; research in biological diversity
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kuo-Chang TsengDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-7801
J Gage CrumpDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3209-0026
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Progenitor Regulation in Craniofacial Development and RegenerationR35DE027550 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CRUMP, GAGE D · 2017 to 2024
$8.0M
Molecular and Cellular Basis of CraniosynostosisR01DE026339 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CRUMP, GAGE D · 2016 to 2025
$6.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026339NIDCR NIH HHS R35 DE027550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of a unique craniofacial complex in vertebrates made possible new ways of breathing, eating, communicating and sensing the environment. The head and face develop through interactions of all three germ layers, the endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm, as well as the so-called fourth germ layer, the cranial neural crest. Over a century of experimental embryology and genetics have revealed an incredible diversity of cell types derived from each germ layer, signaling pathways and genes that coordinate craniofacial development, and how changes to these underlie human disease and vertebrate evolution. Yet for many diseases and congenital anomalies, we have an incomplete picture of the causative genomic changes, in particular how alterations to the non-coding genome might affect craniofacial gene expression. Emerging genomics and single-cell technologies provide an opportunity to obtain a more holistic view of the genes and gene regulatory elements orchestrating craniofacial development across vertebrates. These single-cell studies generate novel hypotheses that can be experimentally validated in vivo. In this Review, we highlight recent advances in single-cell studies of diverse craniofacial structures, as well as potential pitfalls and the need for extensive in vivo validation. We discuss how these studies inform the developmental sources and regulation of head structures, bringing new insights into the etiology of structural birth anomalies that affect the vertebrate head.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSkullAnimalsDevelopmental BiologyGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansNeural CrestVertebratesCongenital anomaliesCranial neural crestCraniofacialSingle-cell genomicsVertebrate head development

Identifiers

PMID37812056
PMCPMC10617621
OpenAlexW4387439454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.