Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812027›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2023

Combining remote sensing and tracking data to quantify species' cumulative exposure to anthropogenic change.

Claire Buchan, James J Gilroy, Inês Catry, Chris M Hewson, Philip W Atkinson, Aldina M A Franco

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire BuchanSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6530-9971
James J GilroySchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-5780
Inês CatrySchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5593-5001
Chris M HewsonBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-5203
Philip W AtkinsonBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0838-557X
Aldina M A FrancoSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-7378
University of East Anglia · GBBritish Trust for Ornithology · GB

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2021.03224.CEECINDNERC EnvEast Studentship NE/L002582/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying when and where organisms are exposed to anthropogenic change is crucial for diagnosing the drivers of biodiversity declines and implementing effective conservation measures. Accurately measuring individual-scale exposure to anthropogenic impacts across the annual cycle as they move across continents requires an approach that is both spatially and temporally explicit-now achievable through recent parallel advances in remote-sensing and individual tracking technologies. We combined 10 years of tracking data for a long-distance migrant, (common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus), with multi-dimensional remote-sensed spatial datasets encompassing thirteen relevant anthropogenic impacts (including infrastructure, hunting, habitat change, and climate change), to quantify mean hourly and total accumulated exposure of tracked individuals to anthropogenic change across each stage of the annual cycle. Although mean hourly exposure to anthropogenic change was greatest in the breeding stage, accumulated exposure to changes associated with direct mortality risks (e.g., built infrastructure) and with climate were greatest during the wintering stage, which comprised 63% of the annual cycle on average for tracked individuals. Exposure to anthropogenic change varied considerably within and between migratory flyways, but there were no clear between-flyway differences in overall exposure during migration stages. However, more easterly autumn migratory routes were significantly associated with lower subsequent exposure to anthropogenic impacts in the winter stage. Cumulative change exposure was not significantly associated with recent local-scale population trends in the breeding range, possibly because cuckoos from shared breeding areas may follow divergent migration routes and therefore encounter very different risk landscapes. Our study highlights the potential for the integration of tracking data and high-resolution remote sensing to generate valuable and detailed new insights into the impacts of environmental change on wild species.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationRemote Sensing TechnologyAnimalsBirdsEcosystemHumansPopulation DynamicsSeasonsanthropogenic changefull seasonmigrationmovement ecologyremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID37812027
PMCPMC10946810
OpenAlexW4387439144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.