Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37811871›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

m7GHub V2.0: an updated database for decoding the N7-methylguanosine (m7G) epitranscriptome.

Xuan Wang, Yuxin Zhang, Kunqi Chen, Zhanmin Liang, Jiongming Ma, Rong Xia, João Pedro de Magalhães, Daniel J Rigden, Jia Meng, Bowen Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RMzyme: regulations of RNA-modifying enzymes in humans.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional Prediction of Epitranscriptome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuan WangDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China.
Yuxin ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Kunqi ChenKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6025-8957
Zhanmin LiangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Jiongming MaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Rong XiaDepartment of Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
João Pedro de MagalhãesInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, B15 2WB, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6363-2465
Daniel J RigdenInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, L7 8TX, Liverpool, UK.
Jia MengDepartment of Biological Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-205X
Bowen SongDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8586-0573
University of Liverpool · GBNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University · CNFujian Medical University · CNUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32100519Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine 013038030001Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversityXJTLU Key Program Special Fund KSF-E-51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent progress in mapping N7-methylguanosine (m7G) RNA methylation sites, tens of thousands of experimentally validated m7G sites have been discovered in various species, shedding light on the significant role of m7G modification in regulating numerous biological processes including disease pathogenesis. An integrated resource that enables the sharing, annotation and customized analysis of m7G data will greatly facilitate m7G studies under various physiological contexts. We previously developed the m7GHub database to host mRNA m7G sites identified in the human transcriptome. Here, we present m7GHub v.2.0, an updated resource for a comprehensive collection of m7G modifications in various types of RNA across multiple species: an m7GDB database containing 430 898 putative m7G sites identified in 23 species, collected from both widely applied next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the emerging Oxford Nanopore direct RNA sequencing (ONT) techniques; an m7GDiseaseDB hosting 156 206 m7G-associated variants (involving addition or removal of an m7G site), including 3238 disease-relevant m7G-SNPs that may function through epitranscriptome disturbance; and two enhanced analysis modules to perform interactive analyses on the collections of m7G sites (m7GFinder) and functional variants (m7GSNPer). We expect that m7Ghub v.2.0 should serve as a valuable centralized resource for studying m7G modification. It is freely accessible at: www.rnamd.org/m7GHub2.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalData Interpretation, StatisticalGuanosineHumans7-methylguanosineGuanosine

Identifiers

PMID37811871
PMCPMC10767970
OpenAlexW4387439655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.