Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37811705›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Fuzapladib in a randomized controlled multicenter masked study in dogs with presumptive acute onset pancreatitis.

Joerg M Steiner, Chantal Lainesse, Yuya Noshiro, Yumiko Domen, Heather Sedlacek, Stephen E Bienhoff, Kelly P Doucette, David L Bledsoe, Hiroshi Shikama

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, VeterinaryMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joerg M SteinerGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-2086
Chantal LainesseIntegRxal Consulting Strategies, Inc., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-2560
Yuya NoshiroIshihara Sangyo Kaisha (ISK) Animal Health LLC, Concord, Ohio, USA.
Yumiko DomenIsihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Heather SedlacekArgenta, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Stephen E BienhoffArgenta, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Kelly P DoucetteScullion Strategy Group, LLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
David L BledsoeScullion Strategy Group, LLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Hiroshi ShikamaIshihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd, Shiga, Japan.
Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha (Japan) · JPArgentine Antarctic Institute · ARUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · USTexas College · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, no specific treatment is available for acute onset pancreatitis (AP), and management relies on symptomatic and supportive standard of care (SOC). Fuzapladib is a novel leukocyte function-associated antigen type-1 (LFA-1) activation inhibitor, blocking activation and subsequent adhesion and migration of neutrophils, potentially decreasing the risk of pancreatitis progression and systemic inflammation.

objectiveEvaluate the safety and clinical response of dogs with AP after 3 days of administration of fuzapladib. ANIMALS: Sixty-one client-owned dogs with presumptive AP.

methodsRandomized, masked, and placebo controlled multicenter study. Sixty-one dogs with AP were included for safety assessment, whereas 35 evaluable cases (fuzapladib, n = 16; placebo, n = 19) were included for clinical evaluation. Clinical improvement was assessed based on the change in the modified clinical activity index (MCAI) score on Day 3 compared to Day 0. Secondary variables included canine acute pancreatitis clinical severity index (CAPCSI) scores and serum concentrations of canine pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity, cytokines, and C-reactive protein.

resultsFuzapladib was well tolerated by all treated dogs. Mean change in MCAI scores was significantly higher in the fuzapladib-treated (-7.75) than the placebo group (-5.68; P = .02, 95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -4.33, -0.35), suggesting clinical improvement in fuzapladib-treated dogs. No significant difference was found in any of the secondary variables between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of fuzapladib to dogs was safe, and a favorable response was detected in 2 clinical activity scores. Effects of fuzapladib on survival and duration of hospitalization were not studied.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsDog DiseasesPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAnimalsC-Reactive ProteinCytokinesDogsInflammationAnti-Inflammatory AgentsC-Reactive ProteinCytokinescanine acute onset pancreatitisdogfuzapladibLFA-1 activation inhibitorlipase

Identifiers

PMID37811705
PMCPMC10658511
OpenAlexW4387439239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.