Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37811392›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2023

Patient perceptions after the operative and nonoperative treatment of shoulder instability: A qualitative focus group study.

Theodore P van Iersel, Eric D Tutuhatunewa, Ithri Kaman, Bas A Twigt, Sigrid Nw Vorrink, Michel Pj van den Bekerom, Derek Fp van Deurzen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06157229 (Multifactorial Approach Training for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair, a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06157229 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Multifactorial Approach Training for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair, a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpaarne GasthuisRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsShoulder Instability, Shoulder Dislocation or Subluxation, Fear of Movement, KinesiophobiaArmsMAT, CABRR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Modified Tampa-Scale of Kinesiophobia for Anterior Shoulder Instability.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theodore P van IerselShoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1892-0780
Eric D TutuhatunewaShoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ithri KamanShoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas A TwigtTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sigrid Nw VorrinkJoint Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel Pj van den BekeromShoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Derek Fp van DeurzenTrauma Unit & Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Little evidence is available regarding patient perceptions of the treatment of shoulder instability. The aim of this study is to investigate patient perceptions regarding the operative and nonoperative treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Methods: Patients who presented to the emergency department or outpatient clinic between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively selected using diagnosis and procedure codes. Online focus groups and semistructured interviews were conducted, systematically recorded and subsequently transcribed to MaxQDA 2007 for qualitative analysis. Coded transcripts of all focus groups were subjected to a grounded theory-based analysis. Results: Six focus groups and two semistructured interviews were hosted with 35 included patients. The mean age of included patients was 34.1 years (±11.5). Eight patients were female (23%), and 27 patients were male (77%). Fear of (recurrent) dislocation, preoperative counseling, communication between surgeon and physiotherapists and need for a consistent postoperative rehab protocol turned out to be important patient perceptions. The most crucial factor for discontent was a lack of communication from the surgeon. Discussion: This patient-centered focus group study revealed that fear of (recurrent) dislocation, preoperative counseling, communication between surgeons and physiotherapists and the need for a consistent postoperative rehabilitation protocol was the most frequently discussed themes.

Indexed as

Bankartfear for dislocationLatarjetpatient perceptionsshoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID37811392
PMCPMC10557926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.