Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37811354›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Axillary Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comparison between Two Perforator Flap Reconstructive Approaches after Radical Surgical Management.

Mohammad Alabdulkareem, Yanis Berkane, Enna Le Bras, Etienne Rousson, Theodoros Chrelias, Tristan Beaufils, Franck-Marie Leclere, Eric Watier, Nicolas Bertheuil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad AlabdulkareemFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Yanis BerkaneFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Enna Le BrasFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Etienne RoussonFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Theodoros ChreliasFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Tristan BeaufilsFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Franck-Marie LeclereDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Poitiers University Hospital, CHU de la Miletrie de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Eric WatierFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Nicolas BertheuilFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU de Rennes, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRMajmaah University · SAUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Axillary hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can result in significant functional impairment in both personal and professional lives. Stage 3 HS requires radical surgical treatment. Flap reconstruction allows for faster healing and better functional and aesthetic outcomes. We compared the results of thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) and propeller inner arm artery perforator (IAAP) flap reconstructions after radical surgical treatment of axillary HS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that included 13 consecutive patients who underwent stage 3 axillary HS treatment between August 2015 and January 2023. Seven patients underwent reconstruction by islanded TDAP flaps, whereas six patients underwent reconstruction by propeller IAAP flaps, with one patient undergoing bilateral reconstruction. The data collected from the patient records included age, gender, smoking status, body mass index, comorbidities, operative time, defect size, flap size, hospital stay, and complications. Results: Although not statistically significant ( Conclusion: After radical surgical management, both islanded TDAP and propeller IAAP flap reconstructions offer excellent outcomes for stage 3 axillary HS. We strongly encourage our peers to consider performing perforator flaps over secondary healing for these patients with a major functional impairment.

Identifiers

PMID37811354
PMCPMC10558224
OpenAlexW4387401125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.