Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37811342›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2023

Spatial Optimization Methods for Malaria Risk Mapping in Sub-Saharan African Cities Using Demographic and Health Surveys.

Camille Morlighem, Celia Chaiban, Stefanos Georganos, Oscar Brousse, Nicole P M van Lipzig, Eléonore Wolff, Sébastien Dujardin, Catherine Linard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Camille MorlighemDepartment of Geography University of Namur Namur Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9085-0591
Celia ChaibanDepartment of Geography University of Namur Namur Belgium.
Stefanos GeorganosGeomatics Unit Department of Environmental and Life Sciences Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden.
Oscar BrousseInstitute of Environmental Design and Engineering University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7364-710X
Nicole P M van LipzigDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-4046
Eléonore WolffDepartment of Geoscience, Environment & Society Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
Sébastien DujardinDepartment of Geography University of Namur Namur Belgium.
Catherine LinardDepartment of Geography University of Namur Namur Belgium.
University of Namur · BEKarlstad University · SEKU Leuven · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases, such as malaria, are affected by the rapid urban growth and climate change in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In this context, intra-urban malaria risk maps act as a key decision-making tool for targeting malaria control interventions, especially in resource-limited settings. The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) provide a consistent malaria data source for mapping malaria risk at the national scale, but their use is limited at the intra-urban scale because survey cluster coordinates are randomly displaced for ethical reasons. In this research, we focus on predicting intra-urban malaria risk in SSA cities-Dakar, Dar es Salaam, Kampala and Ouagadougou-and investigate the use of spatial optimization methods to overcome the effect of DHS spatial displacement. We modeled malaria risk using a random forest regressor and remotely sensed covariates depicting the urban climate, the land cover and the land use, and we tested several spatial optimization approaches. The use of spatial optimization mitigated the effects of DHS spatial displacement on predictive performance. However, this comes at a higher computational cost, and the percentage of variance explained in our models remained low (around 30%-40%), which suggests that these methods cannot entirely overcome the limited quality of epidemiological data. Building on our results, we highlight potential adaptations to the DHS sampling strategy that would make them more reliable for predicting malaria risk at the intra-urban scale.

Indexed as

DHSrandom forestremote sensingsub‐Saharan Africaurban malaria

Identifiers

PMID37811342
PMCPMC10558065
OpenAlexW4387429596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.