ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Assigning channel weights using an attention mechanism: an EEG interpolation algorithm.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missing Data Gap Imputation Methods in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Attention-Enhanced U-Net for Sensor-Efficient High-Density EEG Reconstruction in Wearable Brain Monitoring Systems.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Increasing EEG electrode density improves decoding of visual categories and source localization: an exploratory ultra-high-density EEG study.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Comparative Analysis of Subject-Independent EEG Data Classification Across Multiple Meditation and Non-Meditation Sessions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Novel machine learning-driven comparative analysis of CSP, STFT, and CSP-STFT fusion for EEG data classification across multiple meditation and non-meditation sessions in BCI pipeline.Brain informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the acquisition of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, various factors can influence the data and lead to the presence of one or multiple bad channels. Bad channel interpolation is the use of good channels data to reconstruct bad channel, thereby maintaining the original dimensions of the data for subsequent analysis tasks. The mainstream interpolation algorithm assigns weights to channels based on the physical distance of the electrodes and does not take into account the effect of physiological factors on the EEG signal. The algorithm proposed in this study utilizes an attention mechanism to allocate channel weights (AMACW). The model gets the correlation among channels by learning from good channel data. Interpolation assigns weights based on learned correlations without the need for electrode location information, solving the difficulty that traditional methods cannot interpolate bad channels at unknown locations. To avoid an overly concentrated weight distribution of the model when generating data, we designed the channel masking (CM). This method spreads attention and allows the model to utilize data from multiple channels. We evaluate the reconstruction performance of the model using EEG data with 1 to 5 bad channels. With EEGLAB's interpolation method as a performance reference, tests have shown that the AMACW models can effectively reconstruct bad channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.