Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37811329›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Assigning channel weights using an attention mechanism: an EEG interpolation algorithm.

Renjie Liu, Zaijun Wang, Jiang Qiu, Xue Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renjie LiuKey Laboratory of Flight Techniques and Flight Safety Research Base, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China.
Zaijun WangKey Laboratory of Flight Techniques and Flight Safety Research Base, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China.
Jiang QiuKey Laboratory of Flight Techniques and Flight Safety Research Base, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China.
Xue WangKey Laboratory of Flight Techniques and Flight Safety Research Base, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the acquisition of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, various factors can influence the data and lead to the presence of one or multiple bad channels. Bad channel interpolation is the use of good channels data to reconstruct bad channel, thereby maintaining the original dimensions of the data for subsequent analysis tasks. The mainstream interpolation algorithm assigns weights to channels based on the physical distance of the electrodes and does not take into account the effect of physiological factors on the EEG signal. The algorithm proposed in this study utilizes an attention mechanism to allocate channel weights (AMACW). The model gets the correlation among channels by learning from good channel data. Interpolation assigns weights based on learned correlations without the need for electrode location information, solving the difficulty that traditional methods cannot interpolate bad channels at unknown locations. To avoid an overly concentrated weight distribution of the model when generating data, we designed the channel masking (CM). This method spreads attention and allows the model to utilize data from multiple channels. We evaluate the reconstruction performance of the model using EEG data with 1 to 5 bad channels. With EEGLAB's interpolation method as a performance reference, tests have shown that the AMACW models can effectively reconstruct bad channels.

Indexed as

attention mechanismbad channel interpolationchannel maskingEEGinterpolation algorithmreconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37811329
PMCPMC10552919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.