ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of molecular and genetic markers for hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Machine Learning-Based Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection: An Exploratory Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a deep learning model for predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the main cause of mortality from cancer globally. This paper intends to classify public gene expression data of patients with Hepatitis C virus-related HCC (HCV+HCC) and chronic HCV without HCC (HCV alone) through the XGboost approach and to identify key genes that may be responsible for HCC. Methods: The current research is a retrospective case-control study. Public data from 17 patients with HCV+HCC and 35 patients with HCV-alone samples were used in this study. An XGboost model was established for the classification by 10-fold cross-validation. Accuracy (AC), balanced accuracy (BAC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score were utilized for performance assessment. Results: AC, BAC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 scores from the XGboost model were 98.1, 97.1, 100, 94.1, 97.2, 100, and 98.6%, respectively. According to the variable importance values from the XGboost, the HAO2, TOMM20, GPC3, and PSMB4 genes can be considered potential biomarkers for HCV-related HCC. Conclusion: A machine learning-based prediction method discovered genes that potentially serve as biomarkers for HCV-related HCC. After clinical confirmation of the acquired genes in the following medical study, their therapeutic use can be established. Additionally, more detailed clinical works are needed to substantiate the significant conclusions in the current study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.