ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Results of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Laminectomy With Fusion Versus Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Incidence of Tetraplegia After Cervical Laminectomy Versus Laminoplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Using US Collaborative Network Database in TriNetX.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Laminectomy vs. laminoplasty for treating multi-segment cervical canal stenosis combined with central cord syndrome in the absence of fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Parameter algorithm-driven optimization of surgical approaches: An investigation based on T1 slope minus C2-7 cervical lordosis in patients with cervical degenerative diseases.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
- Impact of surgeries on normal match of T1 slope and cervical lordosis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The authors compared the clinical, MR, and clinical outcomes for patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) who underwent laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy with fusion (LPSF). Materials and methods: The authors evaluated 65 patients with MCSM (2019-2021) with 31 undergoing LP versus 34 having LPSF. Variables studied included JOA scores, T2W MR hyperintense cord signals, preoperative lordosis, number of stenotic levels, and neurological outcomes. Results: Both groups showed similar preoperative JOA scores, number of stenotic levels, T2-weighted MR hyperintense cord signals, and nearly identifcal 12-month postoperative outcomes (good for 83.9 in the LP group vs. 85.3% in the LPSF group). Differences included: higher preoperative visual analog scale in the LPSF versus LP group, plus the LPSF patients significantly less preoperative cervical lordosis versus LP patients. Conclusion: LP and LPSF used to treat MCSM resulted in similar clinical improvement and 1-year postoperative outcomes. However, our recommendation would be for patients with neck pain, instability, and/or cervical kyphosis to undergo LPSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.