Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37810980›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Potential role of vacuum-assisted procedures in resecting breast cancers and highlighting selection criteria to support future trials.

C N Valadares, H L Couto, A N Soares, P H Toppa, B P Ricardo, S A McIntosh, N Sharma, V Resende

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C N ValadaresUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
H L CoutoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
A N SoaresFaculdade Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
P H ToppaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
B P RicardoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
S A McIntoshPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
N SharmaBreast Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, St James Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
V ResendeUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRGrupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte · BRLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in resecting breast cancers. Methods: Retrospective database analysis of 116 cancers [both invasive breast cancers (IC) and ductal carcinoma Results: Mean age was 55.6 years (20-91; SD: 12,27). CR was seen in 29 of 116 cases (25%), MRD in 18 of 116 cases (15.5%), GRD in 64 of 116 cases (55.2%), and five of 116 cases (4.3%) were upgraded from DCIS to IC, and those groups combined represented 47 cases of PRP (40.5%) and 69 (59,5%) of NPR. For 77 tumors ≤ 10 mm, 45 (58.5%) were PRP. Multivariate analysis reveals significance for enlarged VAB (EVAB) ( Conclusions: This study showed that lesions completely excised with VAB that were cancer could have been treated with VAB rather than surgery but tumor selection in terms of subtype and size is important.

Indexed as

biopsybreastbreast cancerminimally invasive procedurevacuum assisted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37810980
PMCPMC10552518
OpenAlexW4386916239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.