Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37810961›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Validation of an automated contouring and treatment planning tool for pediatric craniospinal radiation therapy.

Soleil Hernandez, Hester Burger, Callistus Nguyen, Arnold C Paulino, John T Lucas, Austin M Faught, Jack Duryea, Tucker Netherton, Dong Joo Rhee, Carlos Cardenas and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Soleil HernandezThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, United States.
Hester BurgerDepartment Medical Physics, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Callistus NguyenDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Arnold C PaulinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
John T LucasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Austin M FaughtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Jack DuryeaDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Tucker NethertonDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Dong Joo RheeDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Carlos CardenasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Rebecca HowellThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, United States.
David FuentesDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Julianne Pollard-LarkinThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, United States.
Laurence CourtThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, United States.
Jeannette ParkesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USGroote Schuur Hospital · ZAUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment planning for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is complex and time-consuming, especially for resource-constrained centers. To alleviate demanding workflows, we successfully automated the pediatric CSI planning pipeline in previous work. In this work, we validated our CSI autosegmentation and autoplanning tool on a large dataset from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Methods: Sixty-three CSI patient CT scans were involved in the study. Pre-planning scripts were used to automatically verify anatomical compatibility with the autoplanning tool. The autoplanning pipeline generated 15 contours and a composite CSI treatment plan for each of the compatible test patients (n=51). Plan quality was evaluated quantitatively with target coverage and dose to normal tissue metrics and qualitatively with physician review, using a 5-point Likert scale. Three pediatric radiation oncologists from 3 institutions reviewed and scored 15 contours and a corresponding composite CSI plan for the final 51 test patients. One patient was scored by 3 physicians, resulting in 53 plans scored total. Results: The algorithm automatically detected 12 incompatible patients due to insufficient junction spacing or head tilt and removed them from the study. Of the 795 autosegmented contours reviewed, 97% were scored as clinically acceptable, with 92% requiring no edits. Of the 53 plans scored, all 51 brain dose distributions were scored as clinically acceptable. For the spine dose distributions, 92%, 100%, and 68% of single, extended, and multiple-field cases, respectively, were scored as clinically acceptable. In all cases (major or minor edits), the physicians noted that they would rather edit the autoplan than create a new plan. Conclusions: We successfully validated an autoplanning pipeline on 51 patients from another institution, indicating that our algorithm is robust in its adjustment to differing patient populations. We automatically generated 15 contours and a comprehensive CSI treatment plan for each patient without physician intervention, indicating the potential for increased treatment planning efficiency and global access to high-quality radiation therapy.

Indexed as

autocontouringautoplanningglobal healthpediatricsradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID37810961
PMCPMC10556471
OpenAlexW4386962163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.