ArticleHeliyon2023
Characteristics of solid waste from common generation source in nonferrous smelting industry reveal a new classification method.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid waste produced by the nonferrous smelting industry has a significant number of notable differences. The lack of recognition of solid waste characteristics is the main factor restricting its disposal and utilization. In this study, we analyzed the main production processes of the nonferrous smelting industry; identified the key production nodes of solid waste; and clarified the characteristics, including the physical, chemical, and pollution characteristics of solid wastes, through a large sample statistical analysis. We found similarities among solid wastes from a common generation source as well as notable differences among the different generation sources: slags and sludges from waste acid treatment and wastewater treatment units had a water content of 27.43-52.71% and 51.14-68.27%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of other metallurgy and dust collection units; the pH of slags from an electrorefining unit was strongly alkaline; the mineral phase of sludges from wastewater treatment was only calcite; slags from a waste acid treatment unit were mainly in phase of gypsum, claudetite, and anglesite; the chemical composition of slags from pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy units was mainly SiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.