Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37810856›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Agreement between ten-years cardiovascular disease risk assessment tools: An application to Iranian population in Shahedieh Cohort Study.

Mahdieh Momayyezi, Reyhane Sefidkar, Hossein Fallahzadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahdieh MomayyeziCenter for Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Reyhane SefidkarCenter for Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Hossein FallahzadehCenter for Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Cardiovascular risk-prediction models are efficient primary prevention tools to detect high-risk individuals. The study aims to use three tools to estimate the 10-year risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and investigate their agreement in an Iranian adult population. Methods: The current cross-sectional study was carried out on 8569 adults between 35 and 70 who participated in the first phase of the Shahedieh cohort study in Yazd, Iran, and were free of CVDs (cardiac ischemia or myocardial infarction or stroke). World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) chart, Laboratory-Based (LB) and Non-Laboratory-Based (NLB) Framingham Risk Score (FRS) were used to predict the 10-year risk of developing CVD. The agreement across tools was determined by Kappa. Results: WHO/ISH chart indicated the highest prevalence of low CVD risk for males (96.10%) and females (96.50%), while NLB Framingham had the highest prevalence of high CVD risk for males (19.40%) and females (5.30%). In total, there was substantial agreement between both FRS models (Kappa = o.70), while there was a slight agreement between WHO/ISH and both FRS tools. For under 60 years males and females, substantial agreements were observed between FRS methods (kappa = 0.73 and kappa = 0.68). For males and females over 60 years, this agreement was moderate and substantial, respectively (kappa = 0.54 and kappa = 0.64). WHO/ISH and LB Framingham model had substantial agreement for over 60 years females (kappa = 0.61). Conclusions: Framingham models classified more participants in the high-risk category than WHO/ISH. Due to the lethality of CVDs, categorizing individuals based on FRS can ensure that most of the real high-risk people are detected. Remarkable agreement between FRS methods in all sex-age groups suggested using the NLB Framingham model as a primary screening tool, especially in a shortage of resources condition.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesCardiovascular riskFramingham risk scoresRisk assessmentWHO/ISH risk chart

Identifiers

PMID37810856
PMCPMC10556586
OpenAlexW4386966157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.