Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37810814›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Time matters less: Variance partitioning of return on equity for banks in Uganda.

Boonlert Jitmaneeroj, John Ogwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Boonlert JitmaneerojChulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
John OgwangDepartment of Commerce and Business Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, Lira University, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates variations in the return on equity (ROE) and its determinants within Ugandan banks from 2010 to 2020. Using a two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM), we analyze ROE variability at both time and bank levels, considering temporal effects and the impact of specific bank-level variables on ROE. Variance decomposition reveals that the variability in ROE is more attributable to bank-specific factors than to temporal ones, signifying that individual banks' practices have a more pronounced impact on performance than time-bound fluctuations. Our HLM results, marked by high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) that range between 64.4% and 85.8%, underscore the dominance of bank-level variables in accounting for ROE variations. Key determinants of ROE identified by the HLM analysis include inflation, policy uncertainty, assets, equity, profits, profit margin, asset turnover, equity multipliers, and non-performing loans. A primary takeaway from our findings is the potential for operational efficiency enhancements and judicious investment decisions to produce favorable shifts in ROE. For banking managers, this highlights the necessity for ongoing process refinement and meticulous investment scrutiny. We recommend that policymakers mull over incentives for these practices, possibly through regulatory concessions or guidelines endorsing efficient operational benchmarks.

Indexed as

BanksDuPont analysisHierarchical linear modellingReturn on equityVariance partitioning

Identifiers

PMID37810814
PMCPMC10550619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.