Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37810797›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer : basic and clinical research2023

Real-World Survival and Treatment Regimens Across First- to Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Alan Celik, Tobias Berg, Maj-Britt Jensen, Erik Jakobsen, Hanne Melgaard Nielsen, Iben Kümler, Vesna Glavicic, Jeanette Dupont Jensen, Ann Knoop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer : basic and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Alan CelikDanish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tobias BergDanish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maj-Britt JensenDanish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erik JakobsenDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Southern Jutland Sonderborg Branch, Sonderborg, Denmark.
Hanne Melgaard NielsenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Iben KümlerDepartment of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Vesna GlavicicDepartment of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
Jeanette Dupont JensenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ann KnoopDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group · DKHerlev Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKSygehus Sønderjylland · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival. Currently, the literature lacks comprehensive real-world evidence on locally recurrent and mTNBC patients. To validate the optimal treatment for patients with mTNBC, real-world evidence in combination with data from clinical trials must be evaluated as complementary. Objectives: The objective of the study is to examine outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) utilizing real-world data of patients from all oncology sites across Denmark. Design: This is a retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site, population-based observational study conducted across all oncology departments in Denmark. Methods: We included all women diagnosed with metastatic or locally recurrent TNBC from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, using the national Danish Breast Cancer Group database. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first to third treatment line. Results: The study included 243 women diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The median OS (mOS) was 11.6 months after the first line of treatment, 6.5 months after the second line, and 6.5 months after the third line. De novo mTNBC was associated with shorter OS (mOS: 8.3 vs 14.2 months), and those with a relapse within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS than those with a relapse after 18 months (mOS: 10.0 vs 18.2). In the first line, taxane was the preferred choice of treatment for patients with de novo mTNBC, whereas capecitabine was preferred for patients with recurrent TNBC. Conclusions: This real-world, nationwide study demonstrated poor OS among patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC, with a mOS of 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-17.3). Patients who presented with de novo mTNBC or who had a relapse of their breast cancer within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS. Registration: The study was registered and approved by the Danish Capital Regions research overview (P-2021-605).

Indexed as

metastaticsurvivaltreatmentTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID37810797
PMCPMC10552450
OpenAlexW4387349539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.