ArticleBreast cancer : basic and clinical research2023
Real-World Survival and Treatment Regimens Across First- to Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Breast cancer : basic and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-line treatment patterns and real-world survival outcomes in PD-L1-negative locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the United States.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- TroFuse-011 study design: sacituzumab tirumotecan with or without pembrolizumab for advanced triple-negative breast cancer with PD-L1 CPS <10.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Unmet need for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer initiating first-line treatment: data from the prospective German tumor registry OPAL.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic HR+/HER2- and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Canada: The HER2- TRENDS Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Exploration of real-world outcomes in patients with previously treated HR+/HER2- and triple negative metastatic breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of survival differences in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Capecitabine monotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced HER2-normal breast cancer - a nationwide, retrospective study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Overall Survival and Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival. Currently, the literature lacks comprehensive real-world evidence on locally recurrent and mTNBC patients. To validate the optimal treatment for patients with mTNBC, real-world evidence in combination with data from clinical trials must be evaluated as complementary. Objectives: The objective of the study is to examine outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) utilizing real-world data of patients from all oncology sites across Denmark. Design: This is a retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site, population-based observational study conducted across all oncology departments in Denmark. Methods: We included all women diagnosed with metastatic or locally recurrent TNBC from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, using the national Danish Breast Cancer Group database. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first to third treatment line. Results: The study included 243 women diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The median OS (mOS) was 11.6 months after the first line of treatment, 6.5 months after the second line, and 6.5 months after the third line. De novo mTNBC was associated with shorter OS (mOS: 8.3 vs 14.2 months), and those with a relapse within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS than those with a relapse after 18 months (mOS: 10.0 vs 18.2). In the first line, taxane was the preferred choice of treatment for patients with de novo mTNBC, whereas capecitabine was preferred for patients with recurrent TNBC. Conclusions: This real-world, nationwide study demonstrated poor OS among patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC, with a mOS of 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-17.3). Patients who presented with de novo mTNBC or who had a relapse of their breast cancer within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS. Registration: The study was registered and approved by the Danish Capital Regions research overview (P-2021-605).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.