ArticleACS omega2023
Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Bioactive Compounds Isolated from
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tri-kingdom interactions in bamboo microbiomes: mechanisms of pathogen cooperation and implications for disease management.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Streptomyces cyclosori sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium from the rhizosphere soil of Cyclosorus parasiticus (L.) Farw.The Journal of antibiotics · 2025Article
- Identifying Antimicrobial Agents fromBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Isolation of Actinobacteria from Date Palm Rhizosphere with Enzymatic, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Protein Denaturation Inhibitory Activities.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Microbial diversity and function in bamboo ecosystems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Recent Progress in Terrestrial Biota Derived Antibacterial Agents for Medical Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Metabolic Comparison and Molecular Networking of Antimicrobials inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing concern over multidrug resistance in pathogens has led to an ongoing search for novel antibiotics derived from soil actinobacteria. In this current investigation, actinobacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere of bamboo plants collected within the Megamalai forest of the Western Ghats in the Theni zone of Tamil Nadu, India. These actinobacteria were subjected to characterization, and their growth conditions were optimized to enhance the production of bioactive compounds. To assess antibacterial properties, the isolated Actinobacteria underwent testing using the agar plug method. The strain exhibiting notable antibacterial activity underwent further characterization through 16s rRNA gene sequencing and subsequent phylogenetic analysis. Employing response surface methodology (RSM), cultural conditions were fine-tuned. Bioactive compounds were extracted from the culture medium using ethyl acetate, and their antibacterial and antioxidant effects were evaluated through disc diffusion and DPPH radical scavenging methods, respectively. Ethyl acetate extracts were analyzed by using FT-IR and GC-MS techniques. In total, nine strains of Actinobacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of bamboo. Among these, strain BS-16 displayed remarkable antibacterial activity against three strains:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.