ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
An effective and comprehensible method to detect and evaluate retinal damage due to diabetes complications.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The leading cause of vision loss globally is diabetic retinopathy. Researchers are making great efforts to automatically detect and diagnose correctly diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic retinopathy includes five stages: no diabetic retinopathy, mild diabetic retinopathy, moderate diabetic retinopathy, severe diabetic retinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Recent studies have offered several multi-tasking deep learning models to detect and assess the level of diabetic retinopathy. However, the explanation for the assessment of disease severity of these models is limited, and only stops at showing lesions through images. These studies have not explained on what basis the appraisal of disease severity is based. In this article, we present a system for assessing and interpreting the five stages of diabetic retinopathy. The proposed system is built from internal models including a deep learning model that detects lesions and an explanatory model that assesses disease stage. The deep learning model that detects lesions uses the Mask R-CNN deep learning network to specify the location and shape of the lesion and classify the lesion types. This model is a combination of two networks: one used to detect hemorrhagic and exudative lesions, and one used to detect vascular lesions like aneurysm and proliferation. The explanatory model appraises disease severity based on the severity of each type of lesion and the association between types. The severity of the disease will be decided by the model based on the number of lesions, the density and the area of the lesions. The experimental results on real-world datasets show that our proposed method achieves high accuracy of assessing five stages of diabetic retinopathy comparable to existing state-of-the-art methods and is capable of explaining the causes of disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.