Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37810356›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Wall segmentation in 2D images using convolutional neural networks.

Mihailo Bjekic, Ana Lazovic, Venkatachalam K, Nebojsa Bacanin, Miodrag Zivkovic, Goran Kvascev, Bosko Nikolic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mihailo BjekicEverseen, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ana LazovicDaon, Belgrade, Serbia.
Venkatachalam KDepartment of Applied Cybernetics, University of Hradec Králové, Faculty of Science, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Nebojsa BacaninDepartment of Informatics and Computing, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2062-924X
Miodrag ZivkovicDepartment of Informatics and Computing, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Goran KvascevUniversity of Belgrade, School of Electrical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-0361
Bosko NikolicUniversity of Belgrade, School of Electrical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wall segmentation is a special case of semantic segmentation, and the task is to classify each pixel into one of two classes: wall and no-wall. The segmentation model returns a mask showing where objects like windows and furniture are located, as well as walls. This article proposes the module's structure for semantic segmentation of walls in 2D images, which can effectively address the problem of wall segmentation. The proposed model achieved higher accuracy and faster execution than other solutions. An encoder-decoder architecture of the segmentation module was used. Dilated ResNet50/101 network was used as an encoder, representing ResNet50/101 network in which dilated convolutional layers replaced the last convolutional layers. The ADE20K dataset subset containing only interior images, was used for model training, while only its subset was used for model evaluation. Three different approaches to model training were analyzed in the research. On the validation dataset, the best approach based on the proposed structure with the ResNet101 network resulted in an average accuracy at the pixel level of 92.13% and an intersection over union (IoU) of 72.58%. Moreover, all proposed approaches can be applied to recognize other objects in the image to solve specific tasks.

Indexed as

ADE20KEncoder-decoderPSPNetSemantic segmentationWall segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37810356
PMCPMC10557507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.