ArticleHeliyon2023
Prognostic value of total body muscle-fat ratio in patients with kidney stone disease: A US population-based study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between grip strength and kidney stones: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Mendelian randomization study.Asian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Association between total body muscle-fat ratio and risk of thyroid disorders: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Advances in sarcopenia and urologic disorders.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the relationship between the muscle-fat ratio (MFR) and kidney stone disease (KSD) in the adult population of the United States between 2011 and 2018, and whether it can be used as a predictor of KSD prognosis. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study analysing 9326 patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011 to 2018. We analyzed all participants by sex, age, race, level of education, marital status, household income-to-poverty ratio, hypertension, diabetes, vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, cotinine, and MFR. Dose-response curves with a restricted cubic spline function, univariate and multifactorial logistic regression were used for the analysis of the correlation between MFR and KSD. Finally, we created predictive models based on age, race, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cotinine and MFR. The prediction model was evaluated using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves and clinical decision curves from the training and test sets. Results: Of the 9326 participants, 8582 (92%) self-reported that they did not have KSD and 744 (8%) self-reported that they had KSD. Univariate and multifactorial logistic regression showed that MFR was negatively associated with the prevalence of KSD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.770, 95% CI: 0.703-0.843; OR: 0.815, 95% CI: 0.738-0.897). Similarly, the risk of developing KSD decreased with increasing MFR as shown by the dose curves in the restricted cubic bar graphs. Furthermore, there is some accuracy (AUC = 0.652) and clinical applicability to the model we constructed based on the results of multifactorial logistic regression. Conclusion: The MFR is protective factor against the developing KSD in adults in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.