ArticleHeliyon2023
GSDA: Generative adversarial network-based semi-supervised data augmentation for ultrasound image classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical Ultrasound (US) is one of the most widely used imaging modalities in clinical practice, but its usage presents unique challenges such as variable imaging quality. Deep Learning (DL) models can serve as advanced medical US image analysis tools, but their performance is greatly limited by the scarcity of large datasets. To solve the common data shortage, we develop GSDA, a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based semi-supervised data augmentation method. GSDA consists of the GAN and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The GAN synthesizes and pseudo-labels high-resolution, high-quality US images, and both real and synthesized images are then leveraged to train the CNN. To address the training challenges of both GAN and CNN with limited data, we employ transfer learning techniques during their training. We also introduce a novel evaluation standard that balances classification accuracy with computational time. We evaluate our method on the BUSI dataset and GSDA outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. With the high-resolution and high-quality images synthesized, GSDA achieves a 97.9% accuracy using merely 780 images. Given these promising results, we believe that GSDA holds potential as an auxiliary tool for medical US analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.