Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809742›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Advances in sewage sludge application and treatment: Process integration of plasma pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion with the resource recovery.

Abdulmoseen Segun Giwa, Ndungutse Jean Maurice, Ai Luoyan, Xinxin Liu, Yang Yunlong, Zhao Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biochar-Driven Activity Enhancement of CoMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Environmental impact of a domestic wastewater treatment plant using LCA approach under various treatment scenarios: a case study in Bangladesh.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biochar-based electrochemical sensors: a tailored approach to environmental monitoring.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdulmoseen Segun GiwaSchool of Environment and Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang, 330108, China.
Ndungutse Jean MauriceInstitute of Environmental Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Ai LuoyanSchool of Environment and Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang, 330108, China.
Xinxin LiuSchool of Environment and Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang, 330108, China.
Yang YunlongSchool of Environment and Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang, 330108, China.
Zhao HongJiangxi Transportation Institute Company Limited, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sewage sludge (SS) is an environmental issue due to its high organic content and ability to release hazardous substances. Most of the treatments available are biological, thermal hydrolysis, mechanical (ultrasound, high pressure, and lysis), chemical with oxidation (mainly ozonation), and alkali pre-treatments. Other treatment methods include landfill, wet oxidation, composting, drying, stabilization, incineration, pyrolysis, carbonization, liquefaction, gasification, and torrefaction. Some of these SS disposal methods damage the ecosystem and underutilize the potential resource value of SS. These challenges must be overcome with an innovative technique for the improvement of SS's nutritional value, energy content, and usability. This review proposes plasma pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion (AD) as promising SS treatment technologies. Plasma pyrolysis pre-treats SS to make it digestible by AD bacteria and immobilizes the heavy metals. The addition of Char to the upstream AD process increases the quantity and quality of biogas produced while enhancing the nutrients in the digestate. These two processes are integrated at high temperatures, thus creating concerns about their energy demand. These challenges are offset by the generated energy that can run the treatment plant or be sold to the grid, generating additional cash. Plasma pyrolysis wastes can also be converted into biochar, organic fertilizer, or soil conditioner. These combined technologies' financial sustainability depends on the treatment facility's circumstances and location. Plasma pyrolysis and AD can treat SS sustainably and provide nutrients and resources. This paper explains the co-process treatment route's techno-economic prospects, challenges, and recommendations for the future application of SS valorization and resource recovery.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionMunicipal sewage sludgePlasma pyrolysisProcess integrationResource utilization

Identifiers

PMID37809742
PMCPMC10559074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.