ArticleHeliyon2023
Prognostic accuracy of initial and 24-h maximum SOFA scores of septic shock patients in the emergency department.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an Explainable Machine Learning Model to Predict Mortality Risk in Sepsis Patients: Insights From a Real-World Clinical Data.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Vitamin C appears harmful in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated in the intensive care unit.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of the updated sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)-2 score in emergency department septic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Development and temporal validation of SCRAPS scoring tool to predict poor prognosis in gram negative sepsis patients requiring early intensive care or high dependency unit admission.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- An exploratory study evaluating the predictive capacity of the CALLY index and SOFA-2 for 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with septic shock.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Updated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score: major changes and emergency department perspectives.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Utilizing predictive machine-learning modelling unveils feature-based risk assessment system for hyperinflammatory patterns and infectious outcomes in polytrauma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We compared the prognostic accuracy of in-hospital mortality of the initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using a multicenter prospective registry of septic shock patients in the ED between October 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The prognostic accuracies of SOFA Results: A total of 4860 patients was included, and the in-hospital mortality was 22.1%. In 59.7% of patients, SOFA Conclusion: The prognostic accuracy of the initial SOFA score at the time of sepsis recognition was lower than the 24-h maximal SOFA score in ED patients with septic shock. Follow-up assessments of organ failure may improve discrimination of the SOFA score for predicting mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.