Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809679›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Indicators to measure implementation and sustainability of nursing best practice guidelines: A mixed methods analysis.

Laura D Aloisio, Nicole Graham, Doris Grinspun, Shanoja Naik, Mary Coughlin, Christina Medeiros, Heather McConnell, Anne Sales, Susan McNeill, Wilmer J Santos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura D AloisioClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nicole GrahamUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Doris GrinspunRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shanoja NaikRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mary CoughlinClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christina MedeirosRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Heather McConnellRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anne SalesSinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Susan McNeillRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wilmer J SantosClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Janet E SquiresClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of best practice guidelines (BPGs) has the potential to decrease the gap between best evidence and nursing and healthcare practices. We conducted an exploratory mixed method study to identify strategies, processes, and indicators relevant to the implementation and sustainability of two Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO) BPGs at Best Practice Spotlight Organizations® (BPSOs). Methods: Our study had four phases. In Phase 1, we triangulated two qualitative studies: a) secondary analysis of 126 narrative reports detailing implementation progress from 21 BPSOs spanning four sectors to identify strategies and processes used to support the implementation and sustainability of BPGs and b) interviews with 25 guideline implementers to identify additional strategies and processes. In Phase 2, we evaluated correlations between strategies and processes identified from the narrative reports and one process and one outcome indicator for each of the guideline. In Phase 3, the results from Phases 1 and 2 informed indicator development, led by an expert panel. In Phase 4, the indicators were assessed internally by RNAO staff and externally by Ontario Health Teams. A survey was used to validate proposed indicators to determine relevance, feasibility, readability, and usability with knowledge users and BPSO leaders. Results: Triangulation of the two qualitative studies revealed 46 codes of implementation and sustainability of BPGs, classified into eight overarching themes: Stakeholder Engagement, Practice Interventions, Capacity Building, Evidence-Based Culture, Leadership, Evaluation & Monitoring, Communication, and Governance. A total of 28 structure, process, or outcome indicators were developed. End users and BPSO leaders were agreeable with the indicators according to the validation survey. Conclusions: Many processes and strategies can influence the implementation and sustainability of BPGs at BPSOs. We have developed indicators that can help BPSOs promote evidence-informed practice implementation of BPGs.

Indexed as

Health careImplementation sciencePractice guidelineProgram sustainabilityQuality indicators

Identifiers

PMID37809679
PMCPMC10559663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.