ArticleHeliyon2023
In vitro determination of the protein quality of maize varieties cultivated in Malawi using the INFOGEST digestion method.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological Modifications of the INFOGEST 2.0 Protocol in Plant-Based Food Studies: A Systematic Review.Journal of food science · 2026Pooled it
- INFOGEST Quant: standardized in vitro determination of digestibility and DIAAS of dietary proteins based on the INFOGEST static digestion model.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Evaluation of digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of barley and corn protein concentrates using a minipig model.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Assessment of Technological and Sensory Properties, Digestibility, and Bioactive Compounds inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an urgent need to alleviate protein deficiencies in low-income countries where cereal-based diets dominate. The objective of this study was to use the INFOGEST static digestion method and a recently established analytical workflow to determine the in vitro amino acid digestibility and protein quality of seven maize varieties grown in Malawi. Protein quality was measured using the in vitro digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). Amino acid digestibility was higher for the dehulled, low fibre, provitamin A maize flour (66%), compared to whole grain maize flours (51-61%), suggesting that the presence of fibre reduced digestibility (p < 0.05). Lysine was the limiting amino acid in all varieties, with the following DIAAS values for each variety; Provitamin A maize - 24, SC 719 - 32, Mtsikinya - 37, SC 167 - 39, Quality protein maize (QPM) - 40, Bantum - 40, SC 403 - 44. In addition to the variety of maize, protein quality was dependent on the level of processing and the agronomic practice applied with higher protein quality for the SC 403 variety in which zinc enriched fertilizer was applied. Comparing protein quality data with published in vivo data showed that DIAAS data were in closer agreement than amino acid digestibility data, which was slightly lower than published values, with mean in vitro amino acid digestibilities of 56-70% compared to a mean in vivo value of 77%. Overall, the in vitro method was able to correctly predict both the direction and magnitude of response. The INFOGEST digestion method coupled with the new analytical workflow will therefore be useful in the screening of high protein cereal crops and subsequent development of cereal-based foods with high protein quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.