ArticleHeliyon2023
Macrophages in ulcerative colitis: A perspective from bibliometric and visual analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A two-decade bibliometric analysis of tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancer research.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Emotional experiences, difficulties, and facilitators in patient care of nurses working in surgical units: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Multi-omics reveals efferocytosis-related hub genes as biomarkers for ustekinumab response in colitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Emerging role of exosomes in ulcerative colitis: Targeting NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiology: a bibliometric study.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Burnout among Nurses: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Publications.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Despite the many reported studies on macrophages in ulcerative colitis (UC), the overall research trends in this field are unclear. This study evaluates the research trends and hotspots regarding macrophages in UC using bibliometric analysis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science database to identify publications related to macrophages in UC from 2012 to 2021. R package 'bibliometrix', VOSviewers, CiteSpace and Microsoft Excel were utilised for the bibliometric analysis. Results: 1074 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analysed. The number of publications on macrophages in UC showed a consistently increasing trend, with USA and China as the leading contributors to this field. Notably, Georgia State University and Nanjing University contributed significantly to this field. Among the authors, Wang Y had the highest productivity, while Wu X received the most citations. The journal Conclusions: Research on macrophages in UC holds significant value and practical implications. Additionally, China demonstrated prolific output in this field, while the USA had the most influential contributions. Currently, research hotspots are centred around the modulation of gut microbiota to regulate macrophage polarization and macrophage pyroptosis as potential strategies for mitigating UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.