ArticleHeliyon2023
Nuclear mitochondria-related genes-based molecular classification and prognostic signature reveal immune landscape, somatic mutation, and prognosis for glioma.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioma is the most frequent malignant primary brain tumor, and mitochondria may influence the progression of glioma. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of nuclear mitochondria related genes (MTRGs) in glioma, identify subtypes and construct a prognostic model based on nuclear MTRGs and machine learning algorithms. Methods: Samples containing both gene expression profiles and clinical information were retrieved from the TCGA database, CGGA database, and GEO database. We selected 16 nuclear MTRGs and identified two clusters of glioma. Prognostic features, microenvironment, mutation landscape, and drug sensitivity were compared between the clusters. A prognostic model based on multiple machine learning algorithms was then constructed and validated by multiple datasets. Results: We observed significant discrepancies between the two clusters. Cluster One had higher nuclear MTRG expression, a lower survival rate, and higher immune infiltration than Cluster Two. For the two clusters, we found distinct predictive drug sensitivities and responses to immune therapy, and the infiltration of immune cells was significantly different. Among the 22 combinations of machine learning algorithms we tested, LASSO was the most effective in constructing the prognostic model. The model's accuracy was further verified in three independent glioma datasets. We identified Conclusion: In short, our research identified two clusters of glioma and developed a dependable prognostic model based on machine learning methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.