Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809385›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Assessment of users' adoption behaviour for stock market investment through online applications.

Amar Johri, Mohammad Wasiq, Harpreet Kaur, Mohammad Asif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amar JohriCollege of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad WasiqCollege of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Harpreet KaurMinerva Institute of Management and Technology, Dehradun, India.
Mohammad AsifCollege of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, 11673, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investing in stocks has become increasingly accessible, with beginners able to start an account via a brokerage's website or mobile app with very little money. Online trading through applications allows you to trade independently without a broker's interference. This not only lowers the overall cost of trading but also makes it hassle-free, increasing the value of the business significantly. Using an online trading account gives an investor more control. This paper examined the user's perspective on stock market investment through online applications. The impact of users' awareness, benefits & choice of investment, reliability, safety, risk-related factors, financial literacy, technical aspect, and dependency was analyzed on users' adoption behaviour. An empirical survey with a valid sample of 424 respondents from India was collected from the respondent and analyzed using descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, reliability analysis, analysis of variance, and regression analysis. Results indicated that users' awareness, benefits & choice of investment, reliability, safety, risk-related factors, financial literacy, technical aspect, and dependency significantly influence the users' adoption behaviour in using stock trading applications. The findings will assist potential investors in comprehending the factors influencing the adoption of such apps and aiding the organizations engaged in operating or creating such applications in understanding user behaviour, which will significantly add value to the society at large.

Indexed as

Investment: stock tradingOnline applicationsStock marketUser behaviour

Identifiers

PMID37809385
PMCPMC10558715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.