Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809367›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

A novel study on the influence of graphene-based nanofluid concentrations on the response characteristics and surface-integrity of Hastelloy C-276 during minimum quantity lubrication.

Gurpreet Singh, Shubham Sharma, A H Seikh, Changhe Li, Yanbin Zhang, S Rajkumar, Abhinav Kumar, Rajesh Singh, Sayed M Eldin

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gurpreet SinghDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, Punjab, India.
Shubham SharmaMechanical Engineering Department, University Center for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
A H SeikhMechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh, 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Changhe LiSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, 266520, Qingdao, China.
Yanbin ZhangSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, 266520, Qingdao, China.
S RajkumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Manufacturing, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
Abhinav KumarDepartment of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, 620002, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Rajesh SinghUttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, 248007, India.
Sayed M EldinCenter of Research, Faculty of Engineering, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In present investigation, the impact of nanoparticle concentration on the machining accomplishment of Hastelloy C-276 has been examined in turning operation. The outputs like temperature, surface roughness, chip reduction coefficient (CRC), tool wear, and friction coefficient along with angle of shear have been estimated. The graphene nanoparticles (GnP) have been blended into soybean oil in distinct weight/volume ratio of 0.5, 1 and 1.5%. The experimental observations revealed that higher concentration of nanoparticles has enhanced the heat carrying capacity of amalgamation by 12.28%, surface roughness (27.88%), Temperature (16.8%), tool wear (22.5%), CRC (17.5%), coefficient of friction (46.36%) and shear angle (15%). Scanning electron microscopy identified nose wear, abrasion, adhesion and loss of tool coating. Further, lower tool wear has been noticed at 1.5% concentration, while the complete failure of insert has been reported during 116 m/min, 0.246 mm/rev having 0.5% concentration. ANOVA results exhibited that surface roughness is highly influenced by speed rate (41.66%) trailed by feed rate (28.16%) and then after concentration (13.68%). Temperature is dominated by cutting speed (69.31%), concentration (14.53%) and feed rate (13.25%). Likewise, tool wear was majorly altered by cutting speed (67.2%) accompanied by feed rate (23.90%) and thirdly concentration of GnP (5.03%).

Indexed as

ConcentrationGraphene nanoparticleHastelloy C-276Scanning electron microscopySurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID37809367
PMCPMC10558325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.