Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809334›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Qualitative and quantitative endothelium changes after cataract surgery: ultrasound phacoemulsification vs. nanolaser technique.

Walid Zbiba, Malek Kharrat, Sana Sayadi, Zeineb Kallel, Ghassen Marzouk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walid ZbibaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Tunis El Manar, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Malek KharratDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Tunis El Manar, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Sana SayadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Tunis El Manar, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Zeineb KallelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Tunis El Manar, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Ghassen MarzoukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Tunis El Manar, Nabeul, Tunisia.
Tunis El Manar University · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate corneal endothelial cell density and morphology, central corneal thickness, and best visual acuity using ultrasound (US) phacoemulsification or nanosecond laser technique. Setting: Department of ophthalmology, Nabeul, Tunisia. Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: This study included eyes with nuclear cataracts with a density grade of 1, 2, 3, or 4 according to LOCS III, divided into two groups; group 1 had conventional US, and group 2 had nanosecond laser. The endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation (CoV) in cell size, percentage of hexagonal cells, central corneal thickness (CCT) and best visual acuity (VA) were evaluated during 24 months. Results: Seventy-four eyes had uneventful surgery, 40 in group 1, 34 in group 2. Three procedures in group 2 required conversion to standard phacoemulsification. The mean ECD decreased from 2616.4 ± 194.6 cells/mm Conclusion: Our study showed lower corneal tissue trauma, and lower endothelial cell loss in the laser cataract surgery compared to phacoemulsification.

Indexed as

cataract surgeryendothelial cells densityendothelial cells morphologynanosecond laserphacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID37809334
PMCPMC10551626
OpenAlexW4386923751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.