Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809253›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Retrospective Study of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome in Placenta Accreta Spectrum After Planned or Emergency Delivery From a Tertiary Care Centre in North India.

Ruchi Birendra, Singh Jigyasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruchi BirendraObstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Singh JigyasaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence, sociodemographic profile, feto-maternal outcomes, and associated risk factors of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) among all the deliveries. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all women diagnosed with PAS either preoperatively or intraoperatively. Data on maternal high-risk factors such as previous surgical history, association with placenta praevia, parity and primary outcomes such as the operative procedure carried out, transfusion requirements and ICU admission, as well as neonatal variables such as Apgar score, NICU admission and birthweight, were among the primary outcomes of this study. The study was carried out over a period of 10 months at our centre. Results A cohort of 32 women were identified with placenta accreta, increta, or percreta. The mean maternal age was 31 years. The mean gestational age at the time of diagnosis was 32.75 weeks. Around 50% of patients had risk factors for the abnormally invasive placenta, such as placenta praevia, and 75% had a history of previous caesarean sections. Hysterectomy was done in 28 cases (87.5%). Blood transfusion was done in all the cases. There were two maternal deaths in the study group. The perinatal outcome was better in the antenatally detected cases. Conclusion An increased incidence of PAS has been seen. Early risk factor identification and strategic management improve maternal and foetal outcomes. Our findings demonstrated that PAS pregnancies managed in our centre had maternal and neonatal outcomes comparable to those in developed countries. It is hypothesized that this is because pregnancies with PAS are managed using a multidisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

cesarean hysterectomymassive hemorrhageplacenta accreta spectrum disorderprevious cesarean sectionultrasonography (usg)

Identifiers

PMID37809253
PMCPMC10552932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.