ReviewCureus2023
The Effectiveness of Common Interventions in the Management of Sickle Cell Disease in Primary Care Settings: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Educational and Resource Needs of General Internal Medicine Physicians in Sickle Cell Disease Management.EJHaem · 2026Article
- Review
- Preventive interventions and diagnostic testing compliance in the management of tropical infections among patients with sickle cell disease in Tanzania.Parasites, hosts and diseases · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD), a chronic condition that affects men and women equally, continues to present a public health burden in the United States due to its associated morbidity and complications. Despite advances in medical knowledge and the design of novel therapies for managing the disease, its burden remains compounded because of increasing rates of immigration arising from global displacements and economic unrest in many countries. We thus conducted a comprehensive literature review of publications from 2000 to 2022 to gather guidelines on managing SCD, with a search through four databases, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane; 42 articles met the final inclusion criteria after the full-text article screening process. In the United States healthcare system, primary care physicians (PCPs) are generally providers who cater to the lifelong management of chronic medical conditions, SCD not being an exception. While more SCD patients now present to primary care clinics, many PCPs still lack the confidence and adequate experience necessary to manage the condition effectively. The gap created by the shortage of PCPs extensively equipped to provide comprehensive SCD care leads to poor health outcomes for patients. It is imperative now more than ever to continue to raise awareness about this condition at the provider level, to ensure that patients receive well-rounded care to improve their quality of life and clinical outcomes. Providing up-to-date knowledge about existing and novel therapies and/or modalities of SCD treatment would undoubtedly equip the PCPs with self-assurance to manage the condition adeptly. Thus, we explore various public health interventions such as hydroxyurea therapy, pneumococcal vaccination, penicillin therapy, iron chelation therapy, and clinical decision support tools that have been implemented in primary healthcare settings and shown to be effective in improving SCD care. We also discuss recent advancements that can lead to improved outcomes for SCD patients in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.