ArticleCureus2023
Enamel Remineralization Efficacy of Coconut Milk and Lyophilized Coconut Extract in Different Concentrations on Demineralized Enamel Surfaces: An In-Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim The current study's objective is to determine the remineralizing efficacy of freeze-dried lyophilized coconut extract and coconut milk made from freshly grated coconut on artificial carious lesions produced by pH cycling. Materials and methods Freshly extracted coconut pulp was split into two parts. The first half was blended to obtain coconut milk, and the second part was freeze-dried and lyophilized. Tooth slabs were prepared from extracted third molar teeth. After being demineralized for 72 hours, the tooth samples were remineralized by submerging them in the appropriate remineralizing solution, which is as follows: Group 1 received 25 mL of the Remineralization solution (the control); Group 2 received 2.5 g of coconut milk and 25 mL of the solution (1:1); and Group 3 received 5 g of coconut milk and 25 mL of the solution (2:1). 2.5 g of freeze-dried, lyophilized coconut extract was given to Group 4 along with 25 mL of remineralization solution (1:1), and 5 g of freeze-dried, lyophilized coconut extract was given to Group 5 along with 25 mL of remineralization solution (2:1). Microhardness and contact angle measurements were made. An Excel spreadsheet was filled up with values from after demineralization, and after remineralization. A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Using descriptive statistics, the pretreatment mean values for the microhardness and contact angle of the various groups were evaluated. Post-hoc Tukey tests were utilized to compare the analytic results of the various groups. Results Among the various concentrations of freshly extracted coconut milk, the contact angle in concentrations of 1:1 was 81.22 ± 1.62 deg, and that in concentrations of 2:1 was 88.01 ± 1.85 deg. Between the two concentrations of the lyophilized coconut extract group, the contact angle in 1:1 was 75.05 ± 2.29 deg, and in 2:1 was 71.37 ± 0.85 deg. In the coconut milk group, the value of microhardness was 261 ± 6.4 kg/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.