Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809201›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Surgical Outcome Analysis.

Shaila Sidam, Abhinav Bhagat, Aparna Chavan, Anjan K Sahoo

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaila SidamOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Abhinav BhagatRadiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Aparna ChavanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, RKDF Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Bhopal, IND.
Anjan K SahooOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
RKDF University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical necrotizing fasciitis is an immensely progressive, difficult-to-diagnose soft tissue infection of the fascial planes, skin, and subcutaneous tissue. It has marked morbidity and mortality. In this case report, we analyzed the risk factors, laboratory indices, and treatment modalities that affect the outcome of this fatal disease. This is a retrospective case series of cases admitted within a short span of six months between January and June 23. The cases were followed up monthly for three months, and the diagnosis was made on a clinical, pathological, radiological, and histopathological basis. All the cases were managed with neck exploration and aggressive surgical debridement in an emergency department, dressing of the wound with hydrogen peroxide and betadine twice daily, triple broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy for polymicrobial infection, and tight glycemic control. There were no complications, and all the patients survived. We report our cases of cervical necrotizing fasciitis that had similar presentations but varied outcomes. Here, we would like to advocate the importance of immediate management in the form of neck exploration and debridement at the earliest after the diagnosis has been established. Hyperglycemia should be brought under control, and daily aseptic dressing with removal of the slough and source of infection would greatly affect the outcome of this deadly disease.

Indexed as

broad-spectrum antibioticscervical necrotizing fasciitisdebridementmortalityneck exploration

Identifiers

PMID37809201
PMCPMC10552681
OpenAlexW4386412983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.