ArticleCureus2023
Assessment of Frequency, Patterns, and Causes of Blunt Abdominal Trauma in a North Indian Cohort: An Autopsy-Based Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the FASILA Score for Predicting Interventions and Outcomes in Traumatic Abdominal and Pelvic Injuries: A Prospective Clinical Study.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Incidence, Pattern and Mortality of Traumatic Abdominal Injury, a Three-Year Study at the Largest Trauma Center in Southern Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The abdomen is one of the most frequently damaged areas in trauma patients and is commonly encountered in road traffic accidents (RTAs). The present study evaluates the frequency, etiology, causation, and form of injury in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) cases who had autopsies. Method An autopsy-based observational prospective study was conducted at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Nalanda Medical College and Hospital Patna, India, during the period from October 2018 to September 2020, which included a total of 940 autopsy cases showing blunt abdominal injuries. A predesigned proforma for the postmortem evaluation of BAT victims was used to collect the required information on the cases. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the data were presented as frequency (%) and mean±SD. Chi-square tests were performed to compare categorical variables between groups. Results BAT accounted for 120 (12.76%) cases of all autopsies performed. The majority of victims were male (92.48%). Victims aged 21-30 years (31, 25.83%) were the ones most usually engaged in BAT cases. Among the mechanisms accountable for BAT, RTAs were the most common (99, 82.50%), followed by assault (16, 13.30%). In most of the cases, the liver was injured (107, 89.16%), followed by the spleen (60, 50.00%) and kidney (24, 20.00%). The majority of blunt abdominal injury-related deaths were accidental (100, 83.33%), followed by homicidal (15, 12.5%) and suicidal cases (5, 4.17%). Hemorrhage and neurogenic shock were the most prevalent causes of mortality, particularly if the individual died within a few hours. Conclusion RTAs are the most frequent cause of BAT in autopsy cases, and the liver is the most affected organ. The majority of deaths occur within the first 24 hours of injury. Since blunt abdominal injuries have the propensity to increase morbidity and mortality, appropriate emphasis on their precise diagnosis and satisfactory therapy is mandated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.