Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809032›Full record

ArticleNeuroethics2023

The Ethics of Human Brain Organoid Transplantation in Animals.

Masanori Kataoka, Christopher Gyngell, Julian Savulescu, Tsutomu Sawai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Why brain organoids are not conscious yet.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Novel advanced patient-derivedFrontiers in neurology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masanori KataokaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8687-0589
Christopher GyngellBiomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-3947
Julian SavulescuBiomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-6403
Tsutomu SawaiGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3806-0573

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we outline how one might conduct a comprehensive ethical evaluation of human brain organoid transplantation in animals. Thus far, ethical concerns regarding this type of research have been assumed to be similar to those associated with other transplants of human cells in animals, and have therefore not received significant attention. The focus has been only on the welfare, moral status, or mental capacities of the host animal. However, the transplantation of human brain organoids introduces several new ethical issues. Many of these are related to uncertainty regarding whether or not brain organoids might be conscious. While these concerns might not be immediately relevant, they warrant closer scrutiny. We discuss how various ethical issues are relevant to different stages of human brain organoid transplantation and can guide the ethical evaluation of research. Our examination would broaden the horizons of the debate on the transplantation of brain organoids.

Indexed as

Brain organoidsChimerasConsciousnessEnhancementTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID37809032
PMCPMC10550858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.