Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808969›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Task-based assessment of digital mammography microcalcification detection with deep learning denoising algorithmss using

Andrey Makeev, Stephen J Glick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey MakeevFood and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.
Stephen J GlickFood and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1748-5353
United States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recent research suggests that image quality degradation with reduced radiation exposure in mammography can be mitigated by postprocessing mammograms with denoising algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Breast microcalcifications, along with extended soft-tissue lesions, are the primary breast cancer biomarkers in a clinical x-ray examination, with the former being more sensitive to quantum noise. We test one such publicly available denoising method to observe if an improvement in detection of small microcalcifications can be achieved when deep learning-based denoising is applied to half-dose phantom scans. Approach: An existing denoiser model (that was previously trained on clinical data) was applied to mammograms of an anthropomorphic physical phantom with hydroxyapatite microcalcifications. In addition, another model trained and tested using all synthetic (Monte Carlo) data was applied to a similar digital compressed breast phantom. Human reader studies were conducted to assess and compare image quality in a set of binary signal detection 4-AFC experiments, with proportion of correct responses used as a performance metric. Results: In both physical phantom/clinical system and simulation studies, we saw no apparent improvement in small microcalcification signal detection in denoised half-dose mammograms. However, in a Monte Carlo study, we observed a noticeable jump in 4-AFC scores, when readers analyzed denoised half-dose images processed by the neural network trained on a dataset composed of 50% signal-present (SP) and 50% signal-absent regions of interest (ROIs). Conclusions: Our findings conjecture that deep-learning denoising algorithms may benefit from enriching training datasets with SP ROIs, at least in cases with clusters of 5 to 10 microcalcifications, each of size

Indexed as

anthropomorphic breast phantombreast microcalcificationsdeep-learning denoising algorithmslow-dose mammography

Identifiers

PMID37808969
PMCPMC10557039
OpenAlexW4387407326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.