ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Anaphylactic shock due to intra-articular injection of diclofenac etalhyaluronate sodium: A case report.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anaphylactic shock due to intra-articular injection of diclofenac etalhyaluronate sodium: A case report.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anaphylactic shock of diclofenac etalhyaluronate agent can be prolonged and recurrent. However, its reports are rare, and consequently, its method of management remains to be established. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old woman received an intra-articular injection of diclofenac and hyaluronate. After 20 min, systemic urticaria and severe hypotension developed after walking. After an intramuscular adrenaline injection, she was transferred to our hospital. Despite administration of continuous noradrenaline and adrenaline, hypotension persisted. Seven hours after the joint injection, 25 mL of knee joint fluid was aspirated under ultrasound guidance. Mobilization was performed 24 h after joint injection. However, urticaria rapidly spread after standing. At 45 and 46 h after joint injection, we confirmed that no symptoms, including urticaria, recurred after walking. Conclusion: Anaphylactic shock due to intra-articular injection of diclofenac etalhyaluronate is prolonged and requires extended observation. Aspiration of joint fluid may be one of the treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.