Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808926›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Molecular epidemiology, transmission and clinical features of 2022-mpox outbreak: A systematic review.

Nadim Sharif, Nazmul Sharif, Khalid J Alzahrani, Ibrahim F Halawani, Fuad M Alzahrani, Isabel De la Torre Díez, Vivían Lipari, Miguel Angel López Flores, Anowar K Parvez, Shuvra K Dey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. First Comprehensive Global Bibliometric Analysis of Monkeypox Virus Research Landscape From 1976 to 2025.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. [Mpox clade Ib: an inescapable global threat].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Nadim SharifDepartment of Microbiology Jahangirnagar University Savar Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-2377-9726
Nazmul SharifDepartment of Mathematics Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology Rajshahi Bangladesh.
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences Taif University Taif Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0106
Ibrahim F HalawaniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences Taif University Taif Saudi Arabia.
Fuad M AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences Taif University Taif Saudi Arabia.
Isabel De la Torre DíezUniversity of Valladolid Valladolid Spain.
Vivían LipariUniversidad Europea del Atlántico Santander Spain.
Miguel Angel López FloresUniversidad Europea del Atlántico Santander Spain.
Anowar K ParvezDepartment of Microbiology Jahangirnagar University Savar Dhaka Bangladesh.
Shuvra K DeyDepartment of Microbiology Jahangirnagar University Savar Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2440-5673
Taif University · SAJahangirnagar University · BDUniversidad de Valladolid · ESIbero American University · MXRajshahi University of Engineering and Technology · BDRajshahi University of Engineering and Technology · BDUniversidad Europea del Atlántico · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The 2022-mpox outbreak has spread worldwide in a short time. Integrated knowledge of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and transmission of mpox are limited. This systematic review of peer-reviewed articles and gray literature was conducted to shed light on the epidemiology, clinical features, and transmission of 2022-mpox outbreak. Methods: We identified 45 peer-reviewed manuscripts for data analysis. The standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement and Cochrane Collaboration were followed for conducting the study. Results: The case number of mpox has increased about 100 times worldwide. About 99% of the cases in 2022 outbreak was from non-endemic regions. Men (70%-98% cases) were mostly infected with homosexual and bisexual behavior (30%-60%). The ages of the infected people ranged between 30 and 40 years. The presence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among 30%-60% of cases were reported. Human-to-human transmission via direct contact and different body fluids were involved in the majority of the cases (90%-100%). Lesions in genitals, perianal, and anogenital areas were more prevalent. Unusually, pharyngitis (15%-40%) and proctitis (20%-40%) were more common during 2022 outbreak than pre-2022 outbreaks. Brincidofovir is approved for the treatment of smallpox by FDA (USA). Two vaccines, including JYNNEOSTM and ACAM2000®, are approved and used for pre- and post-prophylaxis in cases. About 100% of the cases in non-endemic regions were associated with isolates of IIb clade with a divergence of 0.0018-0.0035. Isolates from B.1 lineage were the most predominant followed by B.1.2 and B.1.10. Conclusion: This study will add integrated knowledge of the epidemiology, clinical features, and transmission of mpox.

Indexed as

clinical featuresepidemiologymonkeypoxtransmission

Identifiers

PMID37808926
PMCPMC10556267
OpenAlexW4387397535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.