ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Effect of a gender-synchronized family planning intervention on inequitable gender norms in a cluster randomized control trial among husbands of married adolescent girls in Dosso, Niger.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gender inequity is pervasive globally and has severe consequences for health and well-being, particularly for women and girls in Niger. The Reaching Married Adolescents in Niger (RMA) intervention aimed to promote equitable gender norms in order to increase modern contraceptive use and reduce intimate partner violence among married adolescent girls and their husbands in Niger. Using data from a 4-arm factorial cluster randomized control trial of the RMA intervention (2016-2019), the current study assesses effects of the RMA intervention on gender norms among husbands. We used an adjusted hierarchical difference-in-differences linear regression model to assess these effects. The mean score for perceived gender inequitable norms at baseline was 4.1 (n=1,055; range: 0-5). Assignment to the RMA small groups intervention was associated with a 0.62 lower score (95% CI: -1.05, -0.18) relative to controls at follow-up, after adjusting for baseline differences. No significant effects were detected for other intervention arms. As a low-cost, simple, scalable, and transferrable intervention with rigorous evidence of being able to change such gender norms, this community health worker-based small group intervention could be valuable to the field of public health for reducing the negative impact of inequitable gender norms on health and wellbeing in similar settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.