ReviewCureus2023
Auricular Protrusion After the Postauricular Approach: A Review of the Current Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The postauricular approach is a widely adopted surgical technique for the ear due to its unique access to the middle ear, mastoid, and other internal structures, while adeptly concealing the surgical incision for aesthetic superiority. Despite its advantages, concerns have emerged regarding the potential for auricular protrusion following the procedure. While the exact mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain under debate, it is worth noting that comprehensive literature on this topic is scant. Nevertheless, available studies predominantly indicate no association between the postauricular approach and lasting auricular protrusion. In the few reports that do note its occurrence, the protrusion appears transient, resolving over time. These findings suggest that surgeons should continue using the postauricular approach without concerns regarding auricular protrusion. Nonetheless, it is recommended to take all precautionary measures, including appropriate patient selection, engagement of an experienced surgeon, and meticulous postoperative dressing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.