Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808485›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Physical activity monitoring in Alzheimer's disease during sport interventions: a multi-methodological perspective.

Shari David, Christian Hohenfeld, Luisa Haberl, Jennifer Pahl, Ana S Costa, Axel Kilders, Frank Hildebrand, Jörg B Schulz, Kathrin Reetz, Alexa Haeger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shari DavidDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Christian HohenfeldDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Luisa HaberlDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jennifer PahlDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Ana S CostaDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Axel KildersDepartment of Physiotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Frank HildebrandDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jörg B SchulzDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Kathrin ReetzDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Alexa HaegerDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEJülich Aachen Research Alliance · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment methods for physical activity and fitness are of upmost importance due to the possible beneficial effect of physical conditioning on neurodegenerative diseases. The implementation of these methods can be challenging when examining elderly or cognitively impaired participants. In the presented study, we compared three different assessment methods for physical activity from the Dementia-MOVE trial, a 6-months intervention study on physical activity in Alzheimer's disease. The aim was to determine the comparability of physical activity assessments in elderly participants with cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease. Material or methods: 38 participants (mean age 70 ± 7 years) with early-stage Alzheimer's disease (mean MoCA 18.84 ± 4.87) were assessed with (1) fitness trackers for an average of 12 (± 6) days, (2) a written diary on daily activities and (3) a questionnaire on physical activity at three intervention timepoints. For comparison purposes, we present a transformation and harmonization method of the physical assessment output parameters: Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) scores, activity intensity minutes, calorie expenditure and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) scores were derived from all three modalities. The resulting parameters were compared for absolute differences, correlation, and their influence by possible mediating factors such as cognitive state and markers from cerebrospinal fluid. Results: Participants showed high acceptance and compliance to all three assessment methods. MET scores and MVPA from fitness trackers and diaries showed high overlap, whilst results from the questionnaire suggest that participants tended to overestimate their physical activity in the long-term retrospective assessment. All activity parameters were independent of the tested Alzheimer's disease parameters, showing that not only fitness trackers, but also diaries can be successfully applied for physical activity assessment in a sample affected by early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Discussion: Our results show that fitness trackers and physical activity diaries have the highest robustness, leading to a highly comparable estimation of physical activity in people with Alzheimer's disease. As assessed parameters, it is recommendable to focus on MET, MVPA and on accelerometric sensor data such as step count, and less on activity calories and different activity intensities which are dependent on different variables and point to a lower reliability.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedementiaexercisefitnessfitness trackermobile healthphysical activity interventionwearables

Identifiers

PMID37808485
PMCPMC10557074
OpenAlexW4386968070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.