Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808407›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2023

Measurement of the Dentin Wall Thickness of the Maxillary Central Incisor in Relation to the Stage of Root Development: A Pilot Study.

Petra Bučević Sojčić, Jasna Leder Horina, Tanja Jurčević Lulić, Nina Bočkaj, Hrvoje Jurić

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Petra Bučević SojčićDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7135-8291
Jasna Leder HorinaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University North, University Centre Varaždin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1517-5626
Tanja Jurčević LulićDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4462-7705
Nina Bočkaj5th year student, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0361-0692
Hrvoje JurićDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-8706
University of Zagreb · HRUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity North · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the average dentin wall thickness (DWT) of the maxillary central incisor (MCI) required for performing finite element analysis (FEA) models of root development. Material and methods: A total of 137 intraoral periapical radiographs of MCI in children aged 7 to 11 years were examined and then classified into 5 groups according to root development stages, which included 1/2 of root development (S1), 3/4 of root development (S2), more than 3/4 of root development (S3), complete development with wide-open apex (S4) and complete development with closed apex (S5). DWT was measured at three reference (horizontal) lines: at a distance of 1 mm from the apex (M), 4 mm from the apex (L) and at the cervical line (K). The distal dentin wall thickness (M1, L1, and K1), the pulp thickness (M2, L2, and K2), the mesial dentin wall thickness (M3, L3, and K3), and the apex thickness (N) were measured using the diagnostic software Soredex Scanora 5.1.2.4. Statistical analysis compared the values of the parameters K, L, and M between developmental stages (multivariate ANOVA) and the linear correlations between the parameters (Pearson's correlation analysis). All analyses were performed at significance level α = 0.05. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the developmental stages for parameters L and M, while no significant differences were found for parameter K. Most of the correlations between the parameters were statistically significant, with the values of the Pearson correlation coefficient R > 0.6 considered practically significant. All parameters on the same reference line for distal and mesial dentin wall thickness and for pulp thickness correlated well with each other (R = 0.46 - 0.68), but there was no statistically significant correlation with total root thickness on the same reference line (parameters K, L, or M), except for parameter K3 (R = 0.42). Conclusion: Despite the limitations of this study, the mean values of the selected parameters for the 5 groups of developmental stages of the maxillary central incisor could be used to model dentin wall thickness using finite element analysis.

Indexed as

ChildDentin Wall ThicknessFinite Element AnalysisIncisorMaxillary Central IncisorMeSh terms:: DentinogenesisRoot DevelopmentTooth Root

Identifiers

PMID37808407
PMCPMC10557114
OpenAlexW4387411045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.