ArticleBioinformation2023
Feedback on dental implants with dynamic navigation versus freehand.
Article in Bioinformation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can a novice dentist, using a dynamic navigation system, achieve the accuracy of experts using freehand implant placement? a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- An empirical study on the psychological impact of medical AI on patients undergoing dental surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Robotic Surgical Systems in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Dynamic and Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery-A Possible Workflow for the Future?Australian dental journal · 2025Review
- Current status and future developments in dental implantology - a narrative review.Innovative surgical sciences · 2025Review
- Impact of Guided Implant Dentistry on Patient Quality of Life, Satisfaction, and Psychological Well-Being: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Can Dynamic Computer-Guided Surgery Be Useful for Removing an Upper Jaw Odontoma?Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Review
- Article
- Dynamic Navigation Protocol for Direct Sinus Lift and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Aim of the study is to understand and identify if Dynamic Navigation (DN) has an upper hand to provide ease and comfort to the patients during and after surgery. 60 patients requiring 120 Implants, were randomly allocated in 2 groups (Group 1- Freehand surgery, Group 2- Dynamic navigation surgery) requiring dental implant therapy. Patients in both the groups were given a Patient satisfaction questionnaire assessing the following domains: comfort, fear, prior experience with robotics, dental anxiety and pain perception. Patient related Experience measures (PREM's) were assessed using the following domains: experience with robotics, pain perception and comfort of using various instrumentations during the surgery. The pre and post CBCT were compared using EVALUNAV application of the Navident software. There was significant difference (p<0.05) between the two groups in the patient outcomes pertaining to the future of robotics in medicine (group 1: 2±1.259, group 2 :4.8±0.484) and Patients reliability to a specific procedure due to the less surgical time taken (group 1:3.3±0.651, group 2: 4.63±0.556). The post-operative pain between the groups was also assessed with VAS scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.