Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808321›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Advancing microbiome research with machine learning: key findings from the ML4Microbiome COST action.

Domenica D'Elia, Jaak Truu, Leo Lahti, Magali Berland, Georgios Papoutsoglou, Michelangelo Ceci, Aldert Zomer, Marta B Lopes, Eliana Ibrahimi, Aleksandra Gruca and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Human intestinal microbiome: Role in health and disease.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. AI in microbiome-related healthcare.Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Domenica D'EliaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, National Research Council, Institute for Biomedical Technologies, Bari, Italy.
Jaak TruuInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Leo LahtiDepartment of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Magali BerlandUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MetaGenoPolis, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Georgios PapoutsoglouJADBio Gnosis DA S.A., Science and Technology Park of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Michelangelo CeciDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Aldert ZomerDepartment of Biomolecular Health Sciences (Infectious Diseases and Immunology), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marta B LopesCenter for Mathematics and Applications (NOVA Math), NOVA School of Science and Technology, Caparica, Portugal.
Eliana IbrahimiDepartment of Biology, University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.
Aleksandra GrucaDepartment of Computer Networks and Systems, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Alina NechyporenkoSystems Engineering Department, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Marcus FrohmeDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Wildau, Germany.
Thomas KlammsteinerDepartment of Microbiology, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Enrique Carrillo-de Santa PauComputational Biology Group, Precision Nutrition and Cancer Research Program, IMDEA Food Institute, CEI UAM+CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Judith Marcos-ZambranoComputational Biology Group, Precision Nutrition and Cancer Research Program, IMDEA Food Institute, CEI UAM+CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Karel HronDepartment of Mathematical Analysis and Applications of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czechia.
Gianvito PioDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Andrea SimeonBioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Ramona SuharoschiMolecular Nutrition and Proteomics Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Isabel Moreno-IndiasDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, the Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga and Platform in Nanomedicine (IBIMA-BIONAND Platform), University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Andriy TemkoDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Miroslava NedyalkovaChemistry and Pharmacy Department, University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Elena-Simona ApostolComputer Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Ciprian-Octavian TruicăComputer Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Rajesh ShigdelDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jasminka Hasić TelalovićDepartment of Computer Science, University Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Erik Bongcam-RudloffSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Uppsala, Sweden.
Piotr PrzymusNicolaus Copernicus University Torun, Torun, Poland.
Naida Babić JordamovićComputational Biology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy.
Laurent FalquetUniversity of Fribourg and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Sonia TarazonaDepartment of Applied Statistics and Operations Research and Quality, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Alexia SampriBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gaetano IsolaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
David Pérez-SerranoComputational Biology Group, Precision Nutrition and Cancer Research Program, IMDEA Food Institute, CEI UAM+CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Vladimir TrajkovikSs. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Lubos KlucarInstitute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Tatjana Loncar-TurukaloFaculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Aki S HavulinnaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Christian JansenBiome Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Randi J BertelsenUniversity of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marcus Joakim ClaessonSchool of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of machine learning (ML) techniques has opened up the data-dense field of microbiome research for novel therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic applications targeting a wide range of disorders, which could substantially improve healthcare practices in the era of precision medicine. However, several challenges must be addressed to exploit the benefits of ML in this field fully. In particular, there is a need to establish "gold standard" protocols for conducting ML analysis experiments and improve interactions between microbiome researchers and ML experts. The Machine Learning Techniques in Human Microbiome Studies (ML4Microbiome) COST Action CA18131 is a European network established in 2019 to promote collaboration between discovery-oriented microbiome researchers and data-driven ML experts to optimize and standardize ML approaches for microbiome analysis. This perspective paper presents the key achievements of ML4Microbiome, which include identifying predictive and discriminatory 'omics' features, improving repeatability and comparability, developing automation procedures, and defining priority areas for the novel development of ML methods targeting the microbiome. The insights gained from ML4Microbiome will help to maximize the potential of ML in microbiome research and pave the way for new and improved healthcare practices.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebest practicesmachine learningmicrobiomestandards

Identifiers

PMID37808321
PMCPMC10558209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.