ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Comparative genomic analysis of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are the genomes of motileMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Aeromonas in South Asia: genomic insights into an environmental pathogen and reservoir of antimicrobial resistance.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genomic insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Emergence of highly virulentVirulence · 2025Article
- Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Virulent and multidrug-resistant Aeromonas in aquatic environments of Kerala, India: potential risks to fish and humans.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Genomic Insights intoMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Review
- Genomic characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Motile Methods: Here we investigated the bacterial etiology of MAS and compared the genomic features of Results: A total of 25/30 isolates were Discussion: This study confirms previous findings where
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.