ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2023
Evaluations of the 2019 Annual Statistics Under the Cervical Cytology Quality Assurance Agreement: 2019 Annual Statistics for Cervical Cytology from 15608413 Women.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytopathology Terminology Systems: European Federation of Cytological Societies Survey on Practice in Europe.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Article
- Three Years of Co-Testing 2020-2022: Correlation of Diagnostic Colposcopy with Histology in Cases of Normal Cytology and Persistent High-Risk HPV.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Comparison of Ex-House and In-House Cytology for the New Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Registry Study of the Working Group on Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (AGCPC) on the Diagnostic Algorithm for the New Cervical Cancer Screening - Persistent HPV Infections and Squamous Cell Lesions: Evaluation of over 10000 Patients.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- [Cervical cancer screening in Germany 2020-2022 : An analysis of the first round of screening according to the specifications of the oKFE-RL].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer in Germany: A Registry-Based Analysis of Incidence, Survival, and Tumor Characteristics (2003–2021).Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Observational
- First Results for the Evaluation of the Cervical Cancer Screening Carried Out in 2021 and 2022 in the Context of the Organized Cancer Screening Program (oKFE): Part 1 - Primary Screening.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Histology Findings after Two Years of Cytology/HPV Co-Testing in Germany.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer screening, which was introduced into the programme of medical care covered by statutory health insurance in Germany in 1971 and has since been constantly updated through quality assurance measures, was fundamentally revised and developed in 2008 through the Cervical Cytology Quality Assurance Agreement pursuant to Section 135(2) of the German Social Code Book V [SGB V]. Since 2015 it has been mandatory for cytology facilities to record annual statistics based on the Munich Nomenclature III. The aim of this article is to present the results of the annual statistics for 2019, which was the last year before the introduction of the cervical cancer screening programme in accordance with the Federal Joint Committee's guideline on organised cancer screening programmes 1 . Materials and Methods: The annual statistics of the laboratories, including histology analyses performed up until 30 June the following year, are reported to the Regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The laboratories receive benchmark reports from their Regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, and these statistics are transmitted anonymously to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV). Results: In 2019, 17609082 smears from 15608413 women were examined in Germany. Of these smears, 97.49% were normal and 2.51% showed atypical or suspicious changes, consisting mostly of minor squamous epithelial changes in groups II-p (0.81%) and IIID1 (0.735%).Histology specimens are available for "Dysplasia findings with higher probability of regression" in group IIID1 (4.89% of initial IIID1 cytology findings), group IIID2 (18.60%), "unclear or doubtful findings" in group III-p to x (20.7%), and "immediate precursors to cervical carcinoma" in group IV (83.1%) and group V (77.19%).In the cytology findings for group IVa-p, which corresponds to CIN 3 target lesions, the cytology correlated with the histology finding in 80.48% of cases.Lesions found in 2019: 23463 CIN 3 lesions, 668 adenocarcinomas in situ, 3891 malignant tumours, including 2342 cervical carcinomas of which 1743 were squamous cell carcinomas and 599 were cervical adenocarcinomas (25.57%); 1549 endometrial carcinomas and other malignancies. Inference/Conclusion: The data demonstrate the good practicability of cervical cancer screening in 2019. Higher grade lesions were reliably clarified histologically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.