Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808106›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Cutting-edge knowledge on the roles of phytobiotics and their proposed modes of action in swine.

Sriniwas Pandey, Eun Sol Kim, Jin Ho Cho, Minho Song, Hyunok Doo, Sheena Kim, Gi Beom Keum, Jinok Kwak, Sumin Ryu, Yejin Choi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sriniwas PandeyDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Eun Sol KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jin Ho ChoDivision of Food and Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Minho SongDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Hyunok DooDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Sheena KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Gi Beom KeumDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jinok KwakDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Sumin RyuDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Yejin ChoiDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Juyoun KangDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jeehwan ChoeMajor of Beef Science, Department of Livestock, Korea National University of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Hyeun Bum KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the ban on antibiotics in the swine industry, the exploration of alternative options has highlighted phytobiotics as a promising substitute for antibiotic growth promoters, aiming to foster a more sustainable swine industry. Phytobiotics are non-nutritive natural bioactive components derived from plants that offer numerous health benefits. They exhibit antioxidative, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory effects. Phytobiotics can be utilized in various forms, including solid, dried, ground, or as extracts, either in crude or concentrated form. They are characterized by low residual levels, a lack of resistance development, and minimal adverse effects. These qualities make phytobiotics an attractive choice for enhancing health and productivity in swine, presenting them as a viable alternative to antibiotics. While there is a general understanding of the effects of phytobiotics, there is still a need for detailed information regarding their effectiveness and mechanisms of action in practical settings. Therefore, the purpose of this mini review was to summarize the current knowledge supporting the roles of phytobiotics and their proposed modes of action, with a specific focus on swine.

Indexed as

growth performancehealthmodes of actionphytobioticsswine

Identifiers

PMID37808106
PMCPMC10552858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.