Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37808071›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2023

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Belantamab Mafodotin Treatment in Patients With Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Rakesh Popat, Sagar Lonial, Peter M Voorhees, Simona Degli Esposti, Boris Gorsh, Ira Gupta, Joanna Opalinska, Sandhya Sapra, Trisha Piontek, Zangdong He and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Importance of Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rakesh PopatFrom NIHR University College London Hospitals Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sagar LonialEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Peter M VoorheesLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Simona Degli EspostiNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Boris GorshGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ira GuptaGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Joanna OpalinskaGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sandhya SapraGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Trisha PiontekGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Zangdong HeGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
David KleinmanFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Debra SchaumbergUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Antoine RegnaultModus Outcomes, Lyon, France.
Juliette MeunierModus Outcomes, Lyon, France.
Laurie EliasonGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Providence College · USPathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Diseases · FREmory University · USLevine Cancer Institute · USMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the randomized phase II DREAMM-2 study, single-agent belantamab mafodotin demonstrated deep and durable responses and a manageable safety profile in triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from this study for patients treated with the approved dose of belantamab mafodotin (2.5 mg/kg q3w). Disease and treatment-related symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functioning, and patient-reported ocular changes were assessed using questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-MY20, Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], and the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 [NEI VFQ-25]) at baseline, during treatment (every 3 or 6 weeks), and at the end of treatment (EOT). Eye examinations were conducted at baseline, prior to each treatment cycle, and at EOT. Patients reported ocular symptoms in the OSDI and NEI VFQ-25 questionnaires, with the median time to worst severity of 45 to 64 days depending on symptoms considered. Some limitations in driving and reading were reported. Ocular symptoms were improved and median time to recovery was 23.5 to 44.0 days. EORTC-QLQ-C30 data suggest core MM symptoms (including fatigue and pain), overall HRQOL, and patient functioning were maintained while patients continued belantamab mafodotin treatment, even if meaningful worsening of vision-related symptoms occurred. These PRO results, together with the clinical efficacy of belantamab mafodotin, support its use in patients with RRMM and further evaluation of its use at earlier lines of therapy.

Identifiers

PMID37808071
PMCPMC10558016
OpenAlexW4387439847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.