ArticleJTCVS open2023
Effect of red blood cell storage time in pediatric cardiac surgery patients: A subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Article in JTCVS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Red blood cell transfusion management for people undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of red blood cell storage duration on clinical outcomes in pediatric cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Use of whole blood in pediatric congenital heart surgery.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine whether or not transfusion of fresh red blood cells (RBCs) reduced the incidence of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome compared with standard-issue RBCs in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: Preplanned secondary analysis of the Age of Blood in Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit study, an international randomized controlled trial. This study included children enrolled in the Age of Blood in Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit trial and admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were randomized to receive either fresh (stored ≤7 days) or standard-issue RBCs. The primary outcome measure was new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, measured up to 28 days postrandomization or at pediatric intensive care unit discharge, or death. Results: One hundred seventy-eight patients (median age, 0.6 years; interquartile range, 0.3-2.6 years) were included with 89 patients randomized to the fresh RBCs group (median length of storage, 5 days; interquartile range, 4-6 days) and 89 to the standard-issue RBCs group (median length of storage, 18 days; interquartile range, 13-22 days). There were no statistically significant differences in new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome between fresh (43 out of 89 [48.3%]) and standard-issue RBCs groups (38 out of 88 [43.2%]), with a relative risk of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.54; Conclusions: In neonates and children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, the use of fresh RBCs did not reduce the incidence of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome compared with the standard-issue RBCs. A larger trial is needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.